Protest WHO Mpox PHEIC

Greetings

World Health Organization, Director General Tedros announced on August 14, 2024 a “Potential Health Emergency of International Concern” or “PHEIC” in regards to a ”Mpox\'“ or “Monkey Pox” outbreak in Africa I strongly urge the WHO DG to reverse the Mpox emergency PHEIC issued on October 14, 2024 because the reality is that the PCR test is not substantiated and the declaration violates Siracusa Principles as well as violaing the DG\\'s duties of office as a WHO Staff member and international civil servant.

How dare you declare the emergency PHEIC , the people of the world demand WHO cease and desist immediately! Prove your science!

The PCR testing is not functional - Please see evidence  <a href="http://www.pcrfraud.com">at www.pcrfraud.com</a>
The declaration of emergency not in good faith

a. Does not conform to the Siracusa Principles 50-58 & 69b (no experimentation)

Article 50: On the termination of a derogation pursuant to Article 4 all rights and freedoms protected by the Covenant shall be restored in full. A review of the continuing consequences of derogation measures shall be made as soon as possible. Steps shall be taken to correct injustices and to compensate those who have suffered injustice during or in consequence of the derogation measures.C. \"Strictly Required by the Exigencies of the Situation\"

51. The severity, duration, and geographic scope of any derogation measure shall be such only as are strictly necessary to deal with the threat to the life of the nation and are proportionate to its nature and extent.

52. The competent national authorities shall be under a duty to assess individually the necessity of any derogation measure taken or proposed to deal with the specific dangers posed by the emergency.

53. A measure is not strictly required by the exigencies of the situation where ordinary measures permissible under the specific limitations clauses of the Covenant would be adequate to deal with the threat to the life of the nation.

54. The principle of strict necessity shall be applied in an objective manner. Each measure shall be directed to an actual, clear, present, or imminent danger and may not be imposed merely because of an apprehension of potential danger.

55. The national constitution and laws governing states of emergency shall provide for prompt and periodic independent review by the legislature of the necessity for derogation measures.

56. Effective remedies shall be available to persons claiming that derogation measures affecting them are not strictly required by the exigencies of the situation

57. In determining whether derogation measures are strictly required by the exigencies of the situation the judgment of the national authorities cannot be accepted as conclusive.

D. Non-Derogable Rights

58. No state party shall, even in time of emergency threatening the life of the nation, derogate from the Covenant’s guarantees of the right to life; freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and from medical or scientific experimentation without free consent; freedom from slavery or involuntary servitude; the right not to be imprisoned for contractual debt; the right not to be convicted or sentenced to a heavier penalty by virtue of retroactive criminal legislation; the right to recognition as a person before the law; and freedom of thought, conscience and religion. These rights are not derogable under any conditions even for the asserted purpose of preserving the life of the nation.

Article 69(b), No state, including those that are not parties to the Covenant, may suspend or violate, even in times of public emergency:

(a) the right to life;

(b) freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and from medical or scientific experimentation;

Thank you

%%your signature%%