Greetings, Member States and the World Health Organization
FORMAL DEMAND TO HALT PATHOGEN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING FRAMEWORK
TO: Member States of the World Health Organization and National Constitutional Authorities Worldwide
FROM: Citizens and Legal Stakeholders Defending Constitutional Governance and Human Rights
RE: Constitutional and International Law Objections to WHO Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing Framework
URGENT STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION
We, the undersigned citizens, submit this formal petition/demand opposing the World Health Organization's Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing framework, scheduled for final negotiations September 15-19, 2025. This framework seeks to make systematic violations of constitutional governance and international law permanent through binding international treaty obligations.
The timing is critical. Recent events expose fundamental contradictions in current medical governance. On August 27, 2025, the United States Department of Health and Human Services withdrew mRNA product recommendations for healthy populations while maintaining identical interventions for vulnerable populations. This contradiction reveals that authorities understand these interventions cause harm while systematically misrepresenting their experimental nature to circumvent constitutional requirements for informed consent.
September 15-19, 2025 represents the final window to prevent these systematic violations from becoming permanently legal worldwide.
WHAT THE PABS FRAMEWORK ACTUALLY DOES
The PABS framework institutionalizes through binding international treaty the very experimental medical programs that are failing under constitutional scrutiny worldwide:
• Mandatory Corporate Contributions: Requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to contribute "20 percent of their production of medical countermeasures" to WHO during declared emergencies
• WHO Emergency Authority: Grants WHO officials unilateral authority to determine when "pathogen emergencies" justify mandatory contribution requirements, overriding national regulatory determinations
• Constitutional Override: Creates binding international obligations that prevent national authorities from protecting their citizens when they determine experimental interventions present unacceptable risks
The fundamental problem: When competent national authorities determine experimental medical interventions are unsafe (as the United States has for healthy populations), PABS treaty obligations would prevent such determinations from affecting global distribution, systematically undermining national sovereignty and constitutional governance.
WHY PABS VIOLATES ESTABLISHED LAW
Nuremberg Code Violations
Current experimental medical frameworks systematically violate international law through coordinated deception designed to circumvent informed consent requirements. Regulatory authorities characterize experimental gene therapy products as "vaccines" to avoid informing recipients of their participation in ongoing clinical investigations. Citizens were not told they were participating in clinical trials with unknown long-term effects, receiving experimental genetic modification technologies, or experiencing unprecedented mechanisms of cellular production of pathogenic proteins.
Institutional Incapacity
When confronted with judicial orders requiring evidence to support experimental medical programs, health authorities have systematically defaulted rather than providing evidence. In Costa Rica, neither health authorities nor the World Health Organization could provide safety evidence when subjected to constitutional due process requirements, resulting in complete administrative default extending beyond three months.
Treaty Formation Impossibilities
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties establishes that states cannot be bound by treaties violating internal constitutional law or procured through systematic deception. The systematic misrepresentation of experimental gene therapy interventions as traditional vaccines to circumvent informed consent requirements establishes fraud underlying proposed treaty formation.
DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL FAILURES
Legal proceedings across multiple countries demonstrate a consistent pattern: regulatory authorities cannot defend experimental medical programs when subjected to constitutional due process requirements.
Diagnostic Fraud: The Corman-Drosten protocol underlying WHO's PCR diagnostic methodologies was published and accepted within 24 hours despite fundamental scientific flaws, including absence of proper validation. This expedited approval enabled global implementation of invalid testing protocols that created false justification for experimental medical interventions.
Systematic Informed Consent Violations: Documentary evidence reveals systematic withholding of information regarding the experimental nature of interventions, unknown biodistribution patterns, DNA contamination exceeding regulatory safety thresholds, and unprecedented cellular modification mechanisms.
WHO Institutional Defaults: When judicial proceedings required WHO officials to provide evidence supporting their authority, they defaulted rather than defending their position under legal scrutiny, demonstrating fundamental incapacity to create binding legal obligations regarding experimental medical interventions.
Lack of Transparency in Implementation: PABS operations will be conducted through private contracts between WHO and manufacturers that will not be subject to public scrutiny or stakeholder oversight, despite being funded through mandatory corporate contributions and affecting global health policy. This lack of transparency prevents democratic oversight of international agreements affecting national populations.
CONSTITUTIONAL DEMANDS FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION
Based on comprehensive evidence of constitutional violations and international law breaches, we demand immediate governmental action:
1. Immediate Suspension of PABS Negotiations pending constitutional compliance review and resolution of fundamental authority disputes currently under judicial review.
2. Implementation of Transparent Informed Consent Requirements meeting established international standards, including mandatory disclosure that current products are investigational with unknown long-term effects.
3. Judicial Review of Constitutional Questions raised by international health governance frameworks that systematically bypass national constitutional protections through emergency declarations and treaty obligations.
4. Protection of National Sovereignty through refusal to participate in international agreements that violate constitutional requirements for legitimate governmental authority and individual rights protection.
THE FUNDAMENTAL CHOICE BEFORE GOVERNMENTS
The PABS framework presents governments with a fundamental choice between constitutional governance operating through established legal processes that protect individual rights and national sovereignty, versus international bureaucratic authority that systematically circumvents such protections through treaty obligations designed to avoid constitutional accountability.
This choice determines whether emergency declarations can permanently suspend constitutional protections, whether experimental medical interventions can be conducted without informed consent, and whether international agreements can override national sovereignty through mechanisms specifically designed to circumvent legitimate governmental oversight.
LEGAL AUTHORITIES PREVENTING TREATY FORMATION
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Articles 26, 46, 48, and 53 establish requirements for good faith performance, internal law compliance, fraud prevention, and fundamental international law norm protection that PABS systematically violates.
International Human Rights Obligations: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 7, Nuremberg Code, and Helsinki Declaration establish binding prohibitions on non-consensual medical experimentation that PABS would institutionalize.
WHO Constitutional Framework: WHO's own constitutional requirements for organizational independence are violated through systematic integration with private pharmaceutical companies, creating conflicts where commercial interests override public health considerations.
CONCLUSION AND FORMAL CITIZEN DEMAND
We respectfully submit that documented constitutional defects and international law violations underlying the PABS framework render its implementation legally impossible within constitutional governance systems and fundamentally incompatible with established international law principles governing legitimate governmental authority and human rights protection.
The September 15-19, 2025 PABS negotiations represent the final opportunity for constitutional enforcement before diplomatic consensus solidifies into binding international obligations that violate national sovereignty and individual rights protections.
Through this formal petition, we establish documented public opposition to permanent institutionalization of human experimentation through international treaty obligations, providing governmental officials with clear citizen mandate for constitutional compliance and principled resistance to international pressure for treaty participation.
We, the undersigned citizens, formally demand that our governments suspend participation in PABS negotiations and resist international treaty obligations that systematically violate established constitutional principles governing human experimentation, informed consent, and individual rights protection.
CITIZEN SIGNATURES AND FORMAL SUBMISSION
This petition represents citizen opposition to systematic violations of constitutional governance and international law. Citizens worldwide have the constitutional right to demand that their governments comply with established legal principles governing legitimate authority and human rights protection.
Submitted on behalf of citizens worldwide demanding constitutional compliance and resistance to international treaty obligations that violate fundamental human rights and national sovereignty protections.
%%your signature%%