SUE THE WHO
Global Citizens Demanding Accountability for Void Authorizations
0
Global Citizens Have Signed
Movement growing
Recent Signatures
๐ GLOBAL CITIZEN PETITION
Demand WHO Accountability: Invoke Article 75
TO: All WHO Member State Governments
FROM: Citizens of the World
RE: Invoke WHO Constitution Article 75 to Preserve International Court of Justice Jurisdiction Before Withdrawal Deadlines
WHEREAS:
- The World Health Organization ("WHO") issued Emergency Use Listings ("EULs") for COVID-19 mRNA products based on its designation of the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") as a "Stringent Regulatory Authority";
- The U.S. Department of Defense ("DOD") violated 50 U.S.C. ยง 1520a by failing to submit the mandatory Congressional report before conducting biological agent programs on the civilian population, as confirmed by Freedom of Information Act response: "NO RECORDS RESPONSIVE";
- FDA violated its own January 2020 gene therapy guidance by classifying mRNA products as "vaccines" when FDA's own guidance defines "in vitro transcribed RNA" as gene therapy;
- WHO's own website acknowledges that Emergency Use Listed products have "less certainty about safety and efficacy" โ a material fact that was not disclosed to populations receiving these products;
- The Pan American Health Organization ("PAHO") collected over $80 million annually in service fees through its Revolving Fund for products authorized under this void authority chain;
- FDA confirmed that children have died from products authorized under this void authority chain, and FDA's October 2020 "Slide 16" identified anticipated adverse events โ including deaths โ that were not disclosed to the public before authorization;
- WHO Constitution Article 75 provides: "Any question or dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this Constitution which is not settled by negotiation or by the Health Assembly shall be referred to the International Court of Justice";
- The United States has announced withdrawal from WHO, which may extinguish certain legal remedies if Article 75 is not invoked before withdrawal takes effect;
NOW, THEREFORE, WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS PETITION OUR GOVERNMENTS TO:
- INVOKE WHO Constitution Article 75 to preserve International Court of Justice jurisdiction over disputes concerning WHO's interpretation and application of its Constitution, including its Emergency Use Listing procedures;
- DEMAND FULL ACCOUNTABILITY from the World Health Organization for issuing global authorizations based on void regulatory authority without disclosing material information about reduced certainty of safety and efficacy;
- SUPPORT LEGAL ACTION against WHO and PAHO for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and violations of international human rights law including the Nuremberg Code and ICCPR Article 7;
- REQUIRE DISCLOSURE of all documents related to WHO's reliance on FDA as a Stringent Regulatory Authority and WHO's knowledge of the void authority chain;
- SEEK DISGORGEMENT of fees collected by PAHO on products authorized under void authority;
- PROTECT CITIZENS' RIGHTS to informed consent and access to justice for injuries caused by products authorized through fraudulent or void processes.
Key Facts
Void Authority Chain
DOD never filed required Congressional report. FOIA: "NO RECORDS RESPONSIVE."
WHO Admits "Less Certainty"
WHO website states EUL products have "less certainty about safety and efficacy."
$80M+ in PAHO Fees
PAHO retained fees on void-authorized products.
Add Your Signature
Join citizens worldwide
โ๏ธ 501(c)(3)
๐ WHO Stakeholder
WHO Commercial โ The Federal Case
1 What We're Alleging
- โ Fraud: WHO issued authorizations knowing about "less certainty"
- โ Void Authority: WHO relied on FDA without knowing it was void
- โ Unjust Enrichment: PAHO collected $80M+ in fees
2 Who We're Suing
World Health Organization
Issued EULs based on void FDA authority
Pan American Health Organization
Commercially distributed products, $80M+ in fees
๐ Filed in U.S. District Court, District of Columbia